The Meeting Room That Argues Back

 Build an interactive meeting preparation tool that challenges a team's proposed decision before the meeting happens.

Users enter a proposal, supporting evidence, expected benefits, costs, deadlines, affected stakeholders, and known risks. The application generates structured challenge perspectives: skeptical customer, finance reviewer, technical architect, operations manager, competitor, and long-term strategist.

Each perspective must question specific assumptions rather than produce generic objections. Link each challenge to the exact claim it concerns, identify missing evidence, and suggest a practical test that could resolve the disagreement.

Create a live decision workspace with claim cards, evidence attachments, objection status, unresolved questions, and a final decision record. Users should be able to accept, reject, or defer each objection with a written rationale.

Generate a concise meeting brief, agenda, and post-meeting action list. Keep fictional role perspectives clearly labeled as simulations, avoid presenting invented facts as evidence, and preserve the distinction between disagreement and factual error.